On the record
But law, as I have insisted earlier, does not exist for the sake of law.
Said by
Harold J. Laski
Source
gutenberg.orgBut law, as I have insisted earlier, does not exist for the sake of law.
He emphasizes that law should serve a purpose beyond its existence, challenging the notion of law for law's sake.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
That some sort of toleration was inevitable few, save a group of prejudiced irreconcilables, would have denied.
The contract is thus not general as with Hobbes but limited and specific in character.
I can see no justice in such a denial of freedom.
Where mistakes are made, where there is corruption, or dishonesty, or abuse, it can be brought home forthwith to its authors.