Mr. President, I wanted the Senate to know that of the $28 billion, one-third of it goes to wind turbines. We have a national wind policy instead of a national energy policy. We will be spending $2 billion a year on wind subsidies. And there are many other wind subsidies in the Federal Government. You get bonds to build them, you get accelerated depreciation, and then there are the State subsidies. So I am suggesting there is too much wind, and a wiser use of at least half that $10 billion would be for conservation, efficiency, scrubbers, and other forms of energy that are reflected in the 2005 Energy bill.
Douglas Alexander: “Mr. President, I wanted the Senate to know that of the $28 billion, one-third of it goes to wind turbines. We have a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the allocation of funds for wind energy and suggesting a shift towards conservation and efficiency.
Share
More from Douglas Alexander
People in North Lanarkshire, in Fife or in the Highlands know what their communities need better than any minister, whether they sit in London or Edinburgh.
Sumitomo Electric choosing the Highlands for the UK's first subsea HVDC cable factory shows what Scotland has to offer: The skills, ports and expertise to lead the energy industries of the future.
The Prime Minister’s offer to the Scottish Government is a genuine one, and the Scotland Office is ready to roll up its sleeves alongside them to make it happen.
What Andy wants is a national conversation about Brexit and about our relationship with the European Union.





