Of course, we have a number of cases in which the discovery, or the invention, was a mere application of a scientific law (cases like the discovery of the planet Neptune), but in the immense majority of cases the discovery, or the invention, is unscientific to begin with.
Petr Alekseevich Kropotkin: “Of course, we have a number of cases in which the discovery, or the invention, was a mere application of a scientific…”
Editor's note · Context
Kropotkin acknowledges that while some discoveries are applications of scientific laws, most inventions begin without scientific basis.
Share
More from Petr Alekseevich Kropotkin
It is a fact that chemical manures, without organic manure, seldom prove to be sufficient.
And yet it is easy to prove that both are totally erroneous: plenty of food could be grown on the territories of Western Europe for much more than their present populations, and an immense benefit would be derived from doing so.
We have already, in the facts mentioned in this chapter, an experimental basis for quite a number of means of improving our present methods of culture and of largely increasing the crops.
Cottons, plain linen, and machine-made lace are now produced at such a low cost by machinery that hand-weaving evidently becomes an anachronism for the plainest descriptions of such goods.

