Each of us have reached a tentative understanding. And so, we’re not looking for adjustments. What we’re looking for is to see whether our colleagues are open to it.

What is the purpose of that from the Chinese standpoint? Is it to silence outspoken individuals?

Who might be next?

The Senate just passed legislation mandating a diplomatic boycott of the Olympic Games in Beijing and which I believe is very appropriate.

What we are seeing is mass atrocity without mass slaughter. It is the atrocity of genocide without the attendant slaughter of genocide.

Our hearts bleed, as we think of what you are enduring, and what your family is enduring.

Why do you believe they felt they could go ahead and do this?

they could be arrested for doing so under Chinese law.

I think there are some legitimate concerns out there over what might happen if you allowed for name, image, likeness compensation.

Elections have consequences. And the Democrats have a very small majority. And, as a result, they can take action on their own.

Women make unique and invaluable contributions to our families, our communities, and to our workplaces.

I believe that men and women get compensated fairly if they advocate for themselves.

The gender pay gap is the topic that brings us here today.

If--as a society--we truly care about supporting and empowering women, then it is crucial that we understand what those limitations are.

Clearly, it is in our interest in a very critical nation in the world to see vaccinations that we have available going to Taiwan.

I think the best solutions to this crisis are completing the barrier, mandatory E-Verify.

I mean, I do not have the sources of information that you have, obviously, but it read as if it was almost a failed state.

I just hope that you will bring extra attention to that issue.