This has been a tremendously helpful hearing. I just want to thank each of you, again, for taking the time to be here.

That seems like an old, old story that I frankly don't want to see replicated again.

I think, to focus people's minds on the biorisks, I would really target 2025, 2026, maybe even some chance of 2024.

Let me get at this problem from a slightly different angle, which is, let's imagine a hypothetical in which the Communist government of Beijing decides to launch an invasion of Taiwan.

this is a very serious structural issue here that we're going to have to think hard about, and the control of this technology by just a handful of companies and governments is a huge, huge problem.

As AI develops, we've got to make sure that we have safeguards in place that will ensure this new technology is actually good for the American people.

I appreciate that you want your models to be ethical and so forth. That's great.

This has been a tremendously helpful hearing. I just want to thank each of you, again, for taking the time to be here.

I think your point, Mr. Amodei, about securing our supply chains is absolutely critical.

Should we also require monetary compensation if AI companies want to use individual data in their model in some way?

Those folks are showing up because they want to see something done about policing in this community, in this country.

You've said that U.S. has intact spacecraft. You said that the government has alien bodies.

I'm interested in protecting the rights of American workers and American families and American consumers against these massive companies that threaten to become a total law unto themselves.

It seems to me that your technology melded with theirs could make them an enormous sum of money. That would be great for them. Would it be so good for the American consumer?

That seems like an old, old story that I frankly don't want to see replicated again.

I think the path that things are going, in terms of the scaling of open source models, I think it's going down a very dangerous path.

this is a very serious structural issue here that we're going to have to think hard about, and the control of this technology by just a handful of companies and governments is a huge, huge problem.

Let me get at this problem from a slightly different angle, which is, let's imagine a hypothetical in which the Communist government of Beijing decides to launch an invasion of Taiwan.