what's wrong with having a technology that actually employs people in the United States of America and pays them well?

It's been a privilege to get to work with him. These have been incredibly substantive hearings.

this is a very serious structural issue here that we're going to have to think hard about, and the control of this technology by just a handful of companies and governments is a huge, huge problem.

As part of securing our supply chain here in this area, should we consider limitations, if not outright prohibitions, on components that are manufactured in China?

It seems to me that your technology melded with theirs could make them an enormous sum of money. That would be great for them. Would it be so good for the American consumer?

This is an absolutely critical foundational right.

Well, you say that you tell the model not to produce misinformation. I'm not sure exactly what that means, but do you tell it not to help massive companies make a profit?

Well, you say that you tell the model not to produce misinformation. I'm not sure exactly what that means, but do you tell it not to help massive companies make a profit?

The DOJ's own guidelines say that you can't offer this deal. So it's just another example, I think of the sort of sweetheart deal that the Biden seem to get, but it is also just the tip of the iceberg.

I think if we don't do that with China soon--frankly, we should've done it a long time ago--if we don't do it very, very quickly, I think we're in real trouble.

I think the path that things are going, in terms of the scaling of open source models, I think it's going down a very dangerous path.

Let me get at this problem from a slightly different angle, which is, let's imagine a hypothetical in which the Communist government of Beijing decides to launch an invasion of Taiwan.

What's sad about that scenario is, that would be the best-case scenario.

I think, to focus people's minds on the biorisks, I would really target 2025, 2026, maybe even some chance of 2024.

This would be Google's interest. Right? Above all, profits.

That seems like an old, old story that I frankly don't want to see replicated again.

I think we should think of that in a little bit of a different category, and their obligations in a little bit of a different category.

It seems to me that your technology melded with theirs could make them an enormous sum of money. That would be great for them. Would it be so good for the American consumer?