What do you answer to those who say we need not rebuild or convert to new fuels any of the existing fleet, but just fix it to keep running until the renewables come on-line?

I ask that the EPA review the relevant science and issue a new standard for perchlorate, if necessary.

What is going to be the timeline for submitting the scope of work recommendations to FEMA to see the transmission and distribution of funds?

Hypothetically, if one of my constituents drinks well water but the Federal Government assumes that no one is consuming safe water in their health risk assessments, could the Federal Government adequately assess the risk?

How good is our infrastructure right now? Is it going to handle any hurricane?

The dozen or so LNG power units proposed in the PREPA and FEMA action plan, will these in any way prevent the continuance of the conversion to renewables? ... In my personal opinion, the answer is yes.

Are we ready to move completely to renewables today, without having the proper backups?

Can you please provide us a specific timeline for LUMA submitting project Scope of Work documentation for FEMA/COR3 projects?

You agree with me that some of the transformers and the breakers can be taking 1 or 2 years of manufacturing, correct?

Please provide us the latest generation report and the tables/report on the condition of the generating fleet.

if you fail to study a specific source or route of exposure, could the risk be adequately determined?

I think there are several questions that need to be answered.

Can it handle any other situation?

The diesel fuel oil and coal plants have to go, and that is my message to PREPA and to the Fiscal Board.

I want to thank you, Chairman and Ranking Member Westerman, for the opportunity to have this very timely hearing.

Thank you, Representative Wittman, for yielding, I really appreciate that.

We need to conduct meaningful oversight of LUMA and stop the blackouts.

If you don't have power in some rural communities, they will not have water usage at the same time.