I'm just asking you why we should trust you with our children.

I think it's safe to say that all of you are here today because you are opposed to government censorship.

My impression is that Bing Chat doesn't really have an enforceable age verification.

This kind of censorship is un-American, it is unconstitutional, and I hope it will go down as a sad chapter in American history.

Can you imagine the kind of things that your chatbot would say to a 13-year-old?

But you condemn it, to be clear?

What did the White House do? Well, over a period of years, they met with, on a regular basis, the leaders of social media companies, and demanded that the speech they did not like be taken down.

I want them to be making cars here in the United States with American workers.

Because what the Court of Appeals found is that the White House--not just the Federal Government, but the White House--actively coerced every major social media platform in America.

In what circumstances would the parents have access?

Yes. And again, a regime that is fundamentally evil, that is inflicting the kind of atrocities on its own citizens that you just alluded to, that is doing to the Uyghurs, what it's doing, that it's running modern day concentration…

I don't want American companies to be aiding in any way the Chinese government and their oppressive tactics.

They further demanded that these same social media companies amplify the White House's speech.

That's great news for us. Not such great news for the witnesses.

It is a very red line.

Do we want 13-year-olds to be having those conversations?

There's no national security threat that is more significant for the United States than China.

Is it stored in the United States? Is it stored overseas?