the Federal Government owns two out of every three acres in Idaho--67 percent--so it is always interesting to meet with the person who actually has more to say and more control over our lands than Idahoans do.

We have to make sure that the Federal Government, the programs within the Government are as efficient and as effective as humanly possible to meet the broader needs of the people.

That's why I'm reintroducing my bipartisan legislation, the Repeatedly Flooded Communities Preparation Act.

This will turn out about 1,000 megawatts of power.

We have to reexamine the theory of--in my perspective, Mr. Chairman--not just flood insurance, but catastrophic occurrences that are happening more and more across the country.

Planning for that is something that we have just done poorly because we continue to see flood insurance and flood challenges, a National Flood Insurance Program as a coastal program.

My concern is that when you look at the National Flood Insurance Program, the one thing we have to say is that it has not worked the way that it was intended to.

the Federal Government owns two out of every three acres in Idaho--67 percent--so it is always interesting to meet with the person who actually has more to say and more control over our lands than Idahoans do.

Congress should build on their targeted relief measures like the ones we advanced last year, including temporary physician fee schedule support and Medicare telehealth expansion, to address these issues on a bipartisan and sustainable…

It is no secret to anybody that you and I have prioritized mental health delivery in America.

As we look to enhance Medicare, we should prioritize these and other bipartisan goals, and we must do so in a fiscally responsible manner.

I have long championed Medicare Advantage for its ability to offer patients choice and control over their health care.

We have to make sure that the Federal Government, the programs within the Government are as efficient and as effective as humanly possible to meet the broader needs of the people.

That means that the formula that we're using to calculate who should be paying into the system is insufficient and certainly leaves the program underfunded.

That means that the formula that we're using to calculate who should be paying into the system is insufficient and certainly leaves the program underfunded.

Don't do it. We have a legislature in Idaho. Republicans and Democrats. They passed a resolution in both the House and the Senate, unanimously, bipartisan.

Hey, where is the common ground we can get Democrats and Republicans to be for?

Planning for that is something that we have just done poorly because we continue to see flood insurance and flood challenges, a National Flood Insurance Program as a coastal program.