As I said in my opening remarks, I am happy to see this legislation before us today. I appreciate the Committee's effort to bring this forward.

I want to acknowledge how important that is, that they have spoken out in support of this, and how that is no small accomplishment.

We are going to need help from Congress to make sure we fully fund this program so that we can take this insecure Chinese equipment out of our Nation's networks.

I just want to echo those sentiments and caution the Commission from taking action that would attempt to shoehorn an old TV regulation into the growing MVPD marketplace.

My problem is the NCAA. My problem is the Biden administration pushing a rewrite of Title IX.

When you accommodate men, time and time again, refusing to accommodate women, we call that misogyny.

I write in support of H.R. 3397, To require the Director of the Bureau of Land Management to withdraw a rule of the Bureau of Land Management relating to conservation and landscape health.

Let me state clearly for the record that for decades, and decades, and decades, the good people of Utah have managed these lands in a responsible way.

How can Utah ranchers, farmers, and recreationalists have their voices heard, when you are not responding to our letters and you are not holding hearings?

This rule undermines the work of real conservatives, conservationists like farmers and ranchers who have kept the land in good health.

I am writing in strong support of Congressman John Curtis' legislation, H.R. 3397.

In the West we know far better how to manage these lands, and have done better for decades and decades, than any bureaucrat in the East Coast could ever imagine or ever dream of managing these lands.

Do you not feel that you have missed something here by not coming to the people in these good areas and getting their input?

I am trying to understand why that happens.

What is interesting to me is that, if you look at BLM and what their mission is, is that it specifically is to use the land, it is a land management agency, and it is supposed to consider conservation in every activity that it conducts.

The best solution is to rescind the rule.

If you go more specifically to my district, I don't have the specific numbers for BLM, but Federal lands represent about 90 percent, a high percentage of my district.

Conservation means development as much as it does protection.