I appreciate that. That is a good explanation.

It is the United States interest to promote economic freedom, which lifts hundreds of millions of people out of poverty and achieves shared prosperity.

I appreciate that. That is a good explanation.

There is nothing more nonpartisan and bipartisan than the national interests and the national security of the United States of America.

I put a hold on opening the office in Brazil because it was solely focused on climate, and I wanted a broader aperture than just climate.

In that case, China wind up with the project.

The United States cannot compromise its values to achieve messaging-related climate objectives.

It is common knowledge, of course, that there is slave labor involved in the solar industry through China, and people are concerned about that.

There is nothing more nonpartisan and bipartisan than the national interests and the national security of the United States of America.

I put a hold on opening the office in Brazil because it was solely focused on climate, and I wanted a broader aperture than just climate.

There is no place for slave labor in any DFC supported projects.

U.S. taxpayers should not be subsidizing rich countries who have the money to pay their own policy priorities.

There is no place for slave labor in any DFC supported projects.

It is the United States interest to promote economic freedom, which lifts hundreds of millions of people out of poverty and achieves shared prosperity.

U.S. taxpayers should not be subsidizing rich countries who have the money to pay their own policy priorities.

I am concerned, however, about DFC's ability to balance its dual mandate to advance and protect economic freedom, particularly when this Administration at times seeks to use the DFC to promote its agenda.

The United States cannot compromise its values to achieve messaging-related climate objectives.

the DFC cannot save the world on its own.