In other words, comparing funding to enlarge the levy to funding to construct the pumps is like comparing apples and oranges.

Thank you, Secretary Granholm, for your willingness to be here and appearing before the Committee.

Thank you, Secretary Granholm, for your willingness to be here and appearing before the Committee.

Today, I call on my colleagues to join me in supporting the effort to rebuild America's nuclear deterrent. For most Americans, this may seem like a relic of the Cold War, but to those of us tasked with funding our national defense, nuclear…

I am pleased to commend Jimmy Stringer, a dedicated member of my personal staff who left my office recently to return to my home State of Mississippi. Jimmy merits commendation for his contributions and dedicated service throughout his…

I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. Nuclear Deterrence

I just find it extremely concerning that under your watch the FDA allowed the dangerous life-ending, because they do kill the baby, chemical abortion drugs to be ordered by consumers through mail or purchased in retail pharmacies without…

So the FDA, it's more of a legal issue of the procedure that happened than a safety issue of determining what drug is safe.

I just find it extremely concerning that under your watch the FDA allowed the dangerous life-ending, because they do kill the baby, chemical abortion drugs to be ordered by consumers through mail or purchased in retail pharmacies without…

It is deeply frustrating that the subcommittee is being told--six years after a statutory deadline--that it will be another year before FDA issues a final rule on medical gases.

I agree with the fifth circuit's description of this deeply disturbing this of really-not-looking-at-it or the head-in-the-sand approach.

In making its decision to eliminate the in-person dispensing requirement, none of the studies the FDA cited, which were largely conducted by abortion activists, studied the drugs under the new no-test tele-abortion regime.

My main concern is an ectopic pregnancy that if the baby is not positioned which is deadly, or if she's further along that she's saying that she is.

I have heard from all of my local power companies in Mississippi. They are ringing me up.

Americans across the country, led by Concerned Women for America, the Nation's largest public policy organization for women, and other faith-based organizations continue to celebrate April as Faith Month. I commend this noble effort…

The law also requires the FDA to respond to petitions within a 180 days, but the FDA waited roughly 14 years and nearly 3 years to respond to citizens' petitions challenging FDA approval and deregulation of chemical abortion drugs.

I agree with the fifth circuit's description of this deeply disturbing this of really-not-looking-at-it or the head-in-the-sand approach.

In making its decision to eliminate the in-person dispensing requirement, none of the studies the FDA cited, which were largely conducted by abortion activists, studied the drugs under the new no-test tele-abortion regime.