First of all, I think it’s a bizarre response, but I also don’t know that that guy speaks for President Putin or for the Russian government.

I think these guys, we oughta laugh them out of the building.

It’s pure political theater.

That determination was legitimate, and the president’s going to do it again if he has to, but hopefully it won’t be necessary.

While President Trump’s decision may prove just, it’s hard to conceive a rationale that’s Constitutional.

And I think what the Ninth Circuit said very clearly is when the president makes a determination, you’ve got to send in certain federal officials to protect people.

Anytime we make a mistake we correct that very quickly.

I would absolutely say that Gavin Newsom is endangering law enforcement.

If you enforce your own laws and if you protect federal law enforcement, we're not going to send in the National Guard because it's unnecessary.

I was hoping José Padilla would be here to ask a question. But, unfortunately, I guess he decided not to show up because there wasn’t the theater, and that’s all it is.

I understand we want to use all the arrows in our quiver, and he wants to use all his.

Of course, people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy.

That decision ultimately belongs to the president. But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue.

I have yet to see a single good argument for why Iran needed to enrich uranium well above the threshold for civilian use.

I can assure you that [the president] is only interested in using the American military to accomplish American people's goals.

The extreme left has become terrifying.

As you know, there’s new sheriff in town!

I see crypto as a hedge against one of the most dangerous trends in the digital era.