
This committee has heard of specific instances across the Air Force, Marine Corps and Army where work performed by Government employees is being directly converted to contract performance.
On the public record
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
1,000+·quotes on file

This committee has heard of specific instances across the Air Force, Marine Corps and Army where work performed by Government employees is being directly converted to contract performance.

the right mix of operating and generating forces, and the right mix of soldiers, civilians, and contractors.

I said I did not understand the rationale for the reductions in force at Facilities Command Pacific, or the deactivation of the two Seabee battalions.

I want to thank General Dunford for his comments about the Pacific area and how important it is that we continue to increase our force structure.

without a strategic plan in place, why are we proceeding with arbitrary cuts? Why not wait until such a plan is developed?

So what you are saying, Admiral, is that the reviews are not completely finished; is that correct?

So what is each of your military departments doing to reduce contracted services and work requirements, instead of just reducing dollars?

Congresswoman, we are a part of the same process that Admiral Ferguson described within the Department of the Navy.

Well, and we haven't done this when a war is going on as our chairman mentioned.

Why would Congress consider any potential changes to recruiting and retention incentives such as military retirement and health care, or reductions to essential training accounts, when the military departments can't identify the cost of…

So I am asking to what extent are each of the Services involved with OSD [Office of the Secretary of Defense] in developing this review, what are some of the key tenets of this review?

How can the Department consider 'breaking faith' with the troops and propose drastic reforms to retirement and benefits...

I fear this comment is in direct contravention of our country's agreement with Japan which was reaffirmed in June of this year.

P.L. 110-229 expressly intended to include visitors from countries of 'significant economic benefit' to the CNMI in the Guam-CNMI VWP.

I believe this is unwise, given the current threat environment in the Asia Pacific region.

We must always have a ready, a reliable and an accessible Reserve Component.

How will we meet this equipment requirement in a difficult budget environment?

you have my full support--the Air Guard, the Army Guard and the Reserves.