
I think there are profound national security implications.
On the public record
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
10,400+·quotes on file

I think there are profound national security implications.

I am concerned from a national security standpoint. You know the old saying, we are shooting ourselves in the foot. In fact, both feet.

Private markets are notoriously opaque. Unlike other financial institutions, private equity funds and hedge funds are exempt from requirements to maintain anti-money laundering programs.

I have called for the Department to finalize the rule, including a letter I sent in March of 2022.

Private markets are notoriously opaque. Unlike other financial institutions, private equity funds and hedge funds are exempt from requirements to maintain anti-money laundering programs.

I think there are profound national security implications.

I am concerned from a national security standpoint. You know the old saying, we are shooting ourselves in the foot. In fact, both feet.

I have called for the Department to finalize the rule, including a letter I sent in March of 2022.

Private markets are notoriously opaque. Unlike other financial institutions, private equity funds and hedge funds are exempt from requirements to maintain anti-money laundering programs.

I have called for the Department to finalize the rule, including a letter I sent in March of 2022.

I am concerned from a national security standpoint. You know the old saying, we are shooting ourselves in the foot. In fact, both feet.

I think that kind of behavior sends a very strong message about how predictable this Court is and why.

China today poses a set of growing challenges to our national security. It is deploying its military in ways that undermine the security of our allies and partners and the free flow of global trade.

I don't know that there's a better Chairman and Ranking Member to breathe a little life into immigration reform here.

Like so many of these decisions that undo precedent and advantage corporations over regular people, this one was heavily populated with front group amici.

I think there are profound national security implications.

There is a shadow of dark money influence around the Court that is very unhealthy for the institution.

I think it would be better for the country if the Supreme Court and the nominations process had not been so heavily politicized.