There’s a bunch of things in here that I think we’re going to have questions about.

I know he said that, but he’s said that about a lot of other things.

We’ve had the vote on the full version twice now so the full version is five components.

The NDAA is the hallmark piece of legislation that the Armed Services Committee works on each year, and it’s always an honor to have a role in crafting it at the committee level.

There’s something coming out of the White House on a daily basis that keeps life interesting.

Sometimes they’re mad at the president, sometimes they’re mad at the Congress, and I obviously generate a lot of ire in my direction these days.

We’re doing things I never thought we’d have to do, but you’ve got to be creative.

It’s all going to be what can we get to 60 [votes] on over here.

Even though gas prices might be high today, we know they’re going to come down.

Some of the things that have happened the last few weeks have completely thrown a wrench into our ability to execute.

For the most part our members buy into the idea that we are a team. If we’re going to succeed, we’ve got to succeed together, and that means sometimes holding hands and just doing hard things.

I’ve indicated to him in most cases — not all — that what he wants done, we just don’t have the votes for, and there’s nothing I can do to change that.

If the goal is to keep them from having a nuclear weapon, then we ought to make sure they don’t.

It is a program that makes Americans more safe.

I don’t know what realistic is, but we’re gonna probe the limits of it.

I think he’s a really good pick. He’s obviously very capable and competent and [has] a great record. So, my assumption is, and I would certainly hope that Democrats who are being objective about it are going to come to the same conclusion.

It would have, as always, the timing would have been better. It would have been nice if we could had this a couple of days earlier, but like I said, you play the hand you’re dealt and we’ll try and figure out the best way to process this…

By confirming that immunity challenges can only be raised before trial, the court has given prosecutors, defense counsel, and circuit courts a clear procedural framework moving forward.