42 percent of their time filling out administrative paperwork.

I am pleased to yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Trott), a member of the Financial Services Committee and the sponsor of this legislation.

I thank the gentleman for his leadership on this issue and for putting this hour together. Mr. Speaker, I have reviewed the secret memo in a secure setting. After having reviewed the contents of the classified memo relating to FISA abuses…

I am pleased to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Maine (Mr. Poliquin), a member of the Financial Services Committee.

I am pleased to yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Zeldin), a member of the Financial Services Committee and the sponsor of the legislation.

I thank my friend from Pennsylvania for the history lesson he just reminded us about. His words are ones that I don't think I can add anything to. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from California (Mr. Huffman), my friend, if he has…

I thank my friend from California for his comments. He was talking about a memo. One of the former chairmen of the House Intelligence Committee, a guy named Mike Rogers, was also a panelist, I think, on a CNN program. Apparently, this memo…

I have got strong reservations about undermining or loosening the DQSA's prescription requirement in any way, given the consideration that any move in that direction could have an impact on patient safety.

I am joined today by Jared Huffman from California. And eventually, I think, Brendan Boyle from Philadelphia, the home of the new NFC champions, is also going to join us. What we are going to talk about is: What are the Republicans afraid…

As Mr. Green mentioned, he and Congressman Griffith and I worked really hard after that terrible tragedy of the New England Compounding Center to come up with our Compounding Quality Act, which was subsequently folded into the Drug Quality…

We are debating a very important solution. There are hundreds of thousands of workers legally right now in Colorado that are going to be affected by the decisions this Senate makes.

American energy dominance I think is a great, great thing to be proud of, to support, and to pursue.

We have got to find a reform that can actual hold stick and work for the American people.

I understand that people are bitter that we cut taxes and that people are upset that we actually reduced the burden on the American people.

I just do not understand an economic policy that would actually take away bonuses, take away wage hikes, and slow American growth as a result.

It is as if the Government is now run by a bunch of Eeyores who are complaining about pay increases.

Would we be less competitive if we repealed and reversed the tax cuts that passed?

I am going to ask the Speaker: How is it that the Republican majority, in really less than a month, could pass legislation that was the biggest transfer of wealth to the wealthiest people in America through this giant tax cut that costs…