Political Quotes

On the public record

All Quotes

Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.

6,232·quotes on file

Active
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 7, 1998

These are two amendments on which I worked very closely with the chairman. They deal with two problems, one of which is a longstanding problem that we have had with the Internal Revenue Service, and that is how to deal with taxpayers who…

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 7, 1998

briefly, we are doing something that is unprecedented. The distinguished Senator from Alabama says that the Office of Government Ethics is unprecedented. It is the only venture that is unprecedented; never in the history of Government have…

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 6, 1998

in spite of what the Senator from Montana just said, I continue to support his amendment. There is no rebuttable presumption on my part. I believe it is a good amendment, and I am prepared to accept it. I want to comment before the…

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 6, 1998

I don't know on what basis the distinguished Senator from Delaware answers the question that, yes, it is like giving an exemption to bribery law. In our own report, we say the rules related to bribery would continue to apply. I mean, that…

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 6, 1998

First of all, let me once again say that we make exceptions in order to accomplish something that we believe is important to accomplish. We accommodate the exception in order to stay within the guidelines of the Office of Government…

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 6, 1998

again, I say to colleagues there is a three-part test that one has to go through in this regard: A, do you want an oversight board; B, who do you want on the board; and, C, how are you going to deal with apparent conflicts of interest? The…

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 6, 1998

I hope the answer is no, for gosh sakes. We understand what the nature of bribery is.

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 6, 1998

I agree with Senator Roth. This is a very important matter and issue, and I pledge my full cooperation to work with the distinguished Senator from Alabama as well. I call to your attention, with the National Taxpayer Advocate, I think, we…

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 6, 1998

I would like to speak for a minute on the amendment just offered by the Senator from Tennessee and the Senator from Alabama striking the provision in title I concerning the oversight board and specifically concerning the employee…

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 6, 1998

we would be prepared on this side to accept what I consider to be a very, very good amendment. The idea of this board is to give the President authority to select from a wide range of experiences that will assist the Commissioner of the…

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 6, 1998

this amendment addresses a very important problem that we saw in the oversight hearings that the chairman conducted, and that is sometimes the payment made to induce an individual to provide evidence against a taxpayer who is violating the…

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 6, 1998

let me first do as the Senator from Iowa did, Senator Grassley, and compliment the intent of the distinguished Senator from Missouri. I started out exactly where the Senator from Missouri is, considering that a full-time board would be…

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 6, 1998

what happens is that in the first 5 years that this provision is in effect, Joint Tax is estimating there will be $2.6 billion of additional revenue coming in year 1; $3.1 billion in year 2; $3.1 billion in year 3. Americans with incomes…

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 6, 1998

as I said, the die is cast on this thing. This amendment is going to be accepted. The question is, Will we have any reexamination moment? We will reexamine what we are about to do? Again, this affects people with incomes over $100,000 in…

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 6, 1998

The problem is we don't know who will benefit from those tax reductions. We know three principal provisions cost us money. One is the shifting of burden of proof in Tax Court. For citizens, they need to ask themselves, do they go to Tax…

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 6, 1998

I want to make it clear again what we are doing here. We are trying to come up with an offset for $9 billion worth of additional cost that the Senate bill has that the House bill does not. It is $9 billion worth of additional loss of…

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 6, 1998

First of all, as to ``unconscionable,'' we are just following the lead of the chairman of the Budget Committee who apparently is unconscionable as well. He had the same proposal in his budget. Second, let me say this is not to fund the…

govinfo.gov
Bob Kerrey
@bobkerrey· NE· May 6, 1998

Our amendment includes something that I urge my colleagues to consider. My hope is Senator Moynihan will offer this as a free-standing amendment later. Mr. Rossotti, quite appropriately, says we have about 600 days before the 31st of…

govinfo.gov