So from what pot of money is that coming?

If we approved a BRAC nothing would change at all.

Well, let me--oh, good. I am glad you said that because the Army Corps of Engineers recently did a study and they estimated the cost of relocating to Anniston, minus personnel costs, would be approximately $11 million.

Not a good answer, but I thank you for the answer.

I appreciate all our guests being here. I appreciate your testimony.

Why are you still so stubborn about this?

So since you are going to spend the amount of money one way or the other, why would you actually--why in the world would anyone want to spend that much money for the rails into an antiquated facility when you can actually get a better…

Then how are you going to fund the extra gate, the extra manpower, the extra maintenance equipment? How are you going to fund that?

I just find it curious, out of all the thousands of lawyers in the Department of Justice, why they stumbled upon one who was a max-out donor to the DNC.

Our research finds that transitioning to a territorial tax system similar to those used by other advanced industrial countries would generate a significant amount of economic growth and create jobs here in the United States.

I believe that there is bipartisan agreement on the need for tax reform.

The evolution of taxes and spending (and therefore also debt) will be a primary determinant of whether our economy rekindles a successful dynamism.

Our corporate tax system, as Chairman Hatch mentioned, has the highest rate in the world of any advanced economy.

Finding a long term, mandatory funding source for PILT is very important.

It would be a costly mistake for tax reform to heap a heavier burden on the middle class.

My personal view is that it's got to be a high priority, and while you've got a lot of priorities to manage it's a difficult thing.

I disagree with most of the aggressive, often anti-growth proposals in the President's recent budget.

I believe there is bipartisan agreement on the need for tax reform.