I think with your cyber mission, that lends itself well to also having that defense.

If the same event happened today, that on-duty supervisor, on-scene supervisor, should relay that information up to the deputy chief of the White House...

We're in a global battle for market share as to who produces oil and gas in this country, and we're duking it out with OPEC.

It looks like there will be quite a few.

I am going to switch to the September 19 fence-jumper incident and just ask you to give me your report.

We are not in love with any idea; we are in love with what works.

We're at risk for growing our oil and gas industry, our energy industry, in this country versus having it shrink if we don't address this oil export problem and soon.

So that was not complied with in this instance on March 4?

Is this funding adequate for you to do it?

Just one other follow-up question on having adequate personnel, not only retaining adequate personnel, but also the training.

It's the Keystone XL pipeline that has sort of become a metaphor for what we don't have in this country.

So you have a clear policy and procedure in place that requires that? That is in place now?

How many of these are new people or additional people versus backfilling, because you have an attrition challenge, too?

Director, on the Joint Operations Center (JOC), have you taken steps and are you confident that for any incident that might occur at the White House, that they have the communications capability to get everybody doing what they need to be…

So there needs to be some thought given and analysis as to what that retention policy needs to be, correct?

Do you have some way to test and verify that you are ahead of the curve when it comes to unmanned aircraft or to cyber?

What I am trying to understand is your follow-up now to ensure that an incident is properly reported up the chain.

Director, talk about manpower. I know you are, I know, perennially short of manpower.