We can do better as we demonstrated with Libya where we demanded and received anywhere/anytime access to all sites.
On the public record
All Quotes
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
6,309·quotes on file
Based on my personal experience over many years, none of these assertions holds up.
Unfortunately, it appears that the Obama administration may seek to explain away noncompliant behavior as it has reportedly done with Iran's failure to meet its obligations under the Joint Plan of Action.
Congress should vote on the agreement and reject it if you decide that it is a bad agreement.
I believe that this is a historic moment, and at this moment, I do not think one can overstate the importance of the congressional review and action on this agreement.
I identify what I call five fatal flaws of the nuclear agreement with Iran: ineffective verification that will not detect or deter cheating at suspect sites such as at military facilities that Iran's Supreme Leader has declared to be off…
I think that would make a fundamental difference. And if it did, we may not be in the position where we are going to have to use military force against a hardened target and a massive nuclear program.
They are going to continue to do it regardless of consequences.
To say this is a--to be able to walk away from this and say that this is a good deal is ludicrous.
The one thing that bothers me incredibly about this is the billions of dollars that Iran is going to get.
How in the world can you have a nation like Iran doing their own testing?
If we do not go along with this, we are told, the other negotiators are going to go along with this, and the United States will be isolated on this issue.
The word 'perfect' should not even be used in the sentence with this agreement.
Anyone who believes this is a good deal really joins the ranks of the most naive people on the face of the earth.