I strongly support the National Guard and Reserves.

What is the political purpose of the surge?

I understand clearly the responsibilities of the Secretary of Defense. Those responsibilities are very serious.

If we could find a better option, a better way to deal with Iran to assure they do not get nuclear weapons, then we are far better off.

I do, I have, and I strongly agree in terms of that being one of the options the President of the United States would have in addressing Iran.

You have my commitment, and I will enthusiastically work with you on this area.

I am committed completely to modernizing our Navy and everything it includes and will require.

I recognize that, and yes, I would reconsider.

I do not agree with any recommendation that would unilaterally take any action to further reduce our nuclear warheads on our capability.

Accountability is a primary responsibility of any institution or organization.

Do we understand the costs? Are we prepared to make those costs in lives?

There is no question that as I have said this morning, that my experience in Vietnam very much guided the questions.

I do not because it wasn't a recommendation.

As Secretary of Defense, I won't be signing off on reports in the same way as a private citizen.

I was one of some Republican Senators who did not want that vote to go forward.

There will be consequences, significant consequences to the management of our Defense Department.

I regret referencing the Jewish lobby. I should have said pro-Israel lobby.

I agree that with Iran's continued rejection of diplomatic overtures, further effective sanctions, both multilateral and unilateral, may be necessary.