Independent analysis shows that within 10 years, more than half of working families will pay higher taxes than they would have before the new GOP tax law.

Why is now the right time to expose consumers again to the kinds of systemic risk that got us into this financial crisis in the first place?

the Republican tax bill serves special interests and will cost our children dearly for generations to come.

Instead, Republicans chose to cut taxes for large corporations and the super wealthy, and left Americans hoping that those cuts would somehow trickle down to workers.

if you want to guarantee families $4,000 in their income, why not just cut out the middle man and give them a $4,000 tax cut in their income taxes?

I am looking forward to seeing how this models out over time, or how the models match up to reality.

I am curious if the President is interested in reciprocity and proportionality, so much of our challenge there in terms of abuse has been with China not with Canada.

we were chasing the capital offshore. And without capital there was no productivity growth. And without productivity growth, there was no wage growth.

The Republican tax bill serves special interests and will cost our children dearly for generations to come.

Instead, they handed out goodies to large corporations and the uber wealthy, and risked our long-term economic health.

the corporate tax cuts just passed by my Republican colleagues would lead to a $4,000 increase in average household income.

I think Apple is seeing that real money. My constituents are still waiting for their real increase in wages.

My Republican colleagues could have joined with Democrats to invest in children, to invest in workers, education, our long-term economic success.

If, God forbid, that--you know, I hope I am wrong--but if this banking bill were to lead us into another financial crisis, would this Administration want to oppose any public bank bailouts for banks that took on too much systemic risk?

Saying 'whole-of-government approach' is not a substitute for action.

We're running out of time.

I'd love to hear somebody say, 'the buck stops here' instead of 'whole-of-government approach.'

I fear that the phrase 'whole-of-government approach' has become a catchall for 'it's someone else's job.'