The idea that an agency can spend $300 billion without congressional direction--the Inflation Reduction Act was only $750 billion. This was a massive amount of money, and it was not done right.

I certainly would agree with that, and those are areas that, again, I think we could really get some real bang for the buck.

Who will control the data, and who is responsible for its protection as well as the protection of the producer privacy?

At the end of this farm bill process, I would like to go back to rural Arkansans and tell them that we have put policies and programs in place that will improve their quality of life and give their children and their neighbors' children…

we could really get some real bang for the buck.

You are bound by what this Committee wanted to do.

I would like to discuss the Climate Smart Commodities Pilot Program.

Will the producers be made aware of how the data that is generated from projects they are involved in, how it may be used?

We have got to stop the out-of-control partisan spending. We need less regulations, not more.

When will you start accepting ABAWD waivers?

The headwinds for our producers are great.

My point is that when you are going to spend $300 billion, you come to Congress and you say, 'This is a problem. We need to address it. Let us work together to sort it out.'

You did a wonderful job in that regard-we appreciate it.

The President has been very insistent on returning to a number of harmful, overreading regulations.

Who will control the data, and who is responsible for its protection as well as the protection of the producer privacy?

I just do not think it holds water.

I am certain that all my colleagues on this Committee are concerned about the hollowing-out of our States and our country and the impact that this will have on the future of America.

Farm debt is over half-a-trillion at $535 billion.