the Commission has an important role to play in protecting our economy from the harms caused by greedy, reckless corporations.

I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of this amendment, which is a sense of Congress to acknowledge the abhorrent language used by an elected official in Wisconsin.

Mr. Chairman, I move that the Committee report H.R. 4563 favorably to the House, as amended.

I find that extremely troubling, Mr. Long. Extremely troubling. Not a good start.

He said it was a gross abuse of Department authority.

Mr. Chairman, I withdraw the point of order.

That is not what this amendment does. It simply says, let us see what works and does not work; let us make sure that if those States are transitioning to vote-by-mail or trying to improve their system, that we have a sense of best…

This option is particularly important for voters who cannot travel to the polling station due to a disability or their health.

Because it was grossly inconsistent with the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.

I would just like to note that for the record.

One of the great opportunities in the American Confidence in Elections Act is that, when we know best practices...

These increased costs hinder the ability of American public companies to compete on a global scale, putting them at a disadvantage, while China's economic influence continues to grow.

A point of order here, because this amendment is not germane to the American Confidence in Elections Act.

The American Confidence in Elections Act is designed to provide States with the tools that they need to identify best practices as they relate to elections.

the function of tabulating and certifying election results is something that is done by the States, and that I believe that this is not something that we should be including in the American Confidence in Election Act.

I am greatly concerned with the Biden Administration's continued efforts to force non-material environmental, social, and political issues on American companies and investors.

What we are seeking is more accountability and transparency in the proxy process by the duopoly of proxy advisory firms testifying before us today.

What is even more concerning is that these policies end up burdening retail investors, who rely on solid financial returns to save for retirement, purchase a home, or pay for their child's education.