The DOJ's own guidelines say that you can't offer this deal. So it's just another example, I think of the sort of sweetheart deal that the Biden seem to get, but it is also just the tip of the iceberg.

It's been a privilege to get to work with him. These have been incredibly substantive hearings.

That seems like an old, old story that I frankly don't want to see replicated again.

I think if we don't do that with China soon--frankly, we should've done it a long time ago--if we don't do it very, very quickly, I think we're in real trouble.

Well, you say that you tell the model not to produce misinformation. I'm not sure exactly what that means, but do you tell it not to help massive companies make a profit?

This has been a tremendously helpful hearing. I just want to thank each of you, again, for taking the time to be here.

It strikes me that we're told that AI is new and it's a whole new kind of industry and it's glittery and it's almost magical, and yet it looks like it depends, in critical respects, on very old-fashioned, disgusting, immoral labor…

this is a very serious structural issue here that we're going to have to think hard about, and the control of this technology by just a handful of companies and governments is a huge, huge problem.

I think the path that things are going, in terms of the scaling of open source models, I think it's going down a very dangerous path.

Well, you say that you tell the model not to produce misinformation. I'm not sure exactly what that means, but do you tell it not to help massive companies make a profit?

What's sad about that scenario is, that would be the best-case scenario.

I think, to focus people's minds on the biorisks, I would really target 2025, 2026, maybe even some chance of 2024.

This would be Google's interest. Right? Above all, profits.

There's a long, and unfortunate, pattern in this administration of Joe Biden nominating individuals to serve on the bench who have a repeated pattern of showing excessive leniency to criminals.

Will the Senate actually act? Will the leadership in both parties--both parties--will it actually be willing to act?

I want to thank Senator Blumenthal for being willing to do something about this problem.

I think we should think of that in a little bit of a different category, and their obligations in a little bit of a different category.

what's wrong with having a technology that actually employs people in the United States of America and pays them well?