Would increasing loan limits help low- and moderate-income homeowners pay for very needed repairs and renovations?

I am told the cost of, well, this year's funding is $4 million, which seems to be a reasonable investment in such efficiency.

So your conclusion would be that it really saves taxpayers' monies and efficient use of taxpayer' dollars.

Our civil liberties are not currency. They are not a price we pay for national security.

We are happy to pay for--provide additional resources--

Congress certainly has the authority to do that and I think that's one of the key issues for this Committee and the Congress to consider.

The things I can control or the things that the United States can control are its emissions.

Roe v. Wade is an important precedent of the Supreme Court. It was decided in 1973.

I find that somewhat disturbing. It seems to be entirely disruptive of not only the local housing market but the real estate market.

It also might trigger some of the tax incentives that are built in now for home energy efficiencies, which would be sort of a double benefit.

I am told the cost of, well, this year's funding is $4 million, which seems to be a reasonable investment in such efficiency.

Roe v. Wade is an important precedent of the Supreme Court. It was decided in 1973.

I think it's a very unfortunate episode in the Supreme Court's history.

The things I can control or the things that the United States can control are its emissions.

I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the en bloc consideration of the following resolutions, introduced earlier today: S. Res. 176, S. Res. 177, and S. Res. 178. There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the…

I think it's a very unfortunate episode in the Supreme Court's history.

It looked like the rights of women were being deliberately removed from the equation by the Justices of the Supreme Court.

And to quote you the cause of climate change is rising energy consumption using fossil fuels; correct?