No, we're not. We're talking about your chatbot. We're talking about Bing Chat.

Because what the Court of Appeals found is that the White House--not just the Federal Government, but the White House--actively coerced every major social media platform in America.

we have a responsibility here now to do our part to make sure that this new technology, which holds a lot of promise but also peril, actually works for the American people.

That's great news for us. Not such great news for the witnesses.

They further demanded that these same social media companies amplify the White House's speech.

I'm just talking about protecting kids. This is very simple.

we don't make the same mistakes that Congress made with social media where, 30 years ago now, Congress basically outsourced social media to the biggest corporations in the world.

I want them to be making cars here in the United States with American workers.

In what circumstances would the parents have access?

I don't want American companies to be aiding in any way the Chinese government and their oppressive tactics.

Can you imagine the kind of things that your chatbot would say to a 13-year-old?

My impression is that Bing Chat doesn't really have an enforceable age verification.

You'd condemn what the Chinese government's doing to the Uyghurs, and the Xinjiang Province, and all of that?

I can't think of another time in American history when the President of the United States... wanted the censorship.

If they ask you to delete it, you delete it?

It is a very red line.

I don't want AI to be the latest accelerant of that trend.

What did the White House do? Well, over a period of years, they met with, on a regular basis, the leaders of social media companies, and demanded that the speech they did not like be taken down.