Beijing has said that it intends to double China's nuclear power capacity by 2035.

I want this fixed for these school kids, and until we get some answers here, and frankly, some justice for these school kids, I am going to hold every nomination at the Department of Energy.

And just because these kids and their parents are not big-time donors, doesn't mean that they can be ignored.

I thank Chairman Graves for his amazing leadership on this important topic. The arrogance of liberal bureaucrats knows no bounds. When we think that they cannot go any further, they decide that they can regulate the rain that falls from…

Can we agree that at the very least, wherever we think about locating nuclear waste--probably not a great idea to have it in proximity to school children?

Section 230, as we know it today, is not only outmoded, it's not only outdated, it's really completely unrecognizable from what Congress wrote in the 1990s.

I think the best way you protect the little guy and give him the power or her the power to take on the big guy, is allow them into court, let them get discovery, let them hire a tort lawyer, let them bring their suits.

Surely we can agree that there should be--whether it's the standard you propose Professor Franks, which I think is pretty close actually to traditional distributor liability.

I think that's actually much closer to what Section 230, when Congress wrote it, was meant to be.

I think that's actually much closer to what Section 230, when Congress wrote it, was meant to be.

I believe in markets. I'm skeptical of massive regulatory agencies, but one of the reasons I'm skeptical is I just see them get captured time, after time, after time.

I'm a father of three children, all of them very small. I worry about this every day--my oldest is 10--as they get old enough to want to be on the internet.

If Congress acts on this issue, what would be your recommendations for the best way to address this problem, from a policy legislative perspective?

the core tenets of 230, limited liability for hosting user-generated content, can be protected while insisting... the platform's design features that we now know is leading to many of the harms.

Does anything in the text of Section 230 as it was originally written, suggest, in your view, that platforms ought to get this really form of super immunity for promoting, taking other people's content, hosting it, promoting it, and in…

If Congress acts on this issue, what would be your recommendations for the best way to address this problem, from a policy legislative perspective?

the right of Americans to obtain redress if they've been harmed by knowing misconduct has been eviscerated.

the core tenets of 230, limited liability for hosting user-generated content, can be protected while insisting... the platform's design features that we now know is leading to many of the harms.