It would be a clean CR mostly, I think, but with some of those changes to adapt to the new realities here.
It probably is as close to a clean CR as possible.
The White House has made a commitment. The president said over and over and over, ‘We’re not going to touch Social Secur...
We're going to find those guys and we're going to send them back to work. That's what everybody supports, that's what th...
The White House has made a commitment, the president has said over and over and over, 'We're not gonna touch Social Secu...
We're not gonna do that.
We're gonna find those guys and we're gonna send them back to work.
You don't want able-bodied workers on a program that is intended, for example, for single mothers with two small childre...
The most reasonable thing to do to ensure that the government is not shut down.
Don’t ever, ever take the position that you’re not going to follow the order of a federal court. Ever.
We're talking about finding efficiencies in every program but not cutting benefits for people who rightly deserve that.
Short answer? Likely no. Long answer? Hell no.
Let’s let this play out.
The new reality is less government, more efficiency, better return for the taxpayers.
Look, everybody needs to understand that the resolution is merely the starting point for the process.
That’s why I say you add anomalies to a (continuing resolution); you can increase some spending, you can decrease some s...
Cuts to the program would target 'fraud, waste and abuse' within the program.
