If you care about deficits or economic growth, you have to care about climate change and its costs and risks.
And around here, there's an entire political party dedicated to protecting them as they pollute for free.
The U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness is the only Federal agency that is exclusively devoted to alleviating homelessness.
I find that somewhat disturbing. It seems to be entirely disruptive of not only the local housing market but the real estate market.
Roe v. Wade is an important precedent of the Supreme Court. It was decided in 1973.
Our civil liberties are not currency. They are not a price we pay for national security.
Congress certainly has the authority to do that and I think that's one of the key issues for this Committee and the Congress to consider.
We are happy to pay for--provide additional resources--
With Section 702 set to sunset at the end of this year it is vital that we have these discussions before we take our next steps.
I think it's a very unfortunate episode in the Supreme Court's history.
It looked like the rights of women were being deliberately removed from the equation by the Justices of the Supreme Court.
It's pretty basic economics that negative externalities belong in the price, and therefore are a subsidy.
The things I can control or the things that the United States can control are its emissions.
You claim that renewable energy is always expensive.
And to quote you the cause of climate change is rising energy consumption using fossil fuels; correct?
I think this is another evidence-free effort to try to interfere with [energy] competition for their fossil fuel overlords.
They have completely lost their grip on reality, and are so subservient to fossil fuel overlords that they're willing to eliminate hundreds ...
