I don't think you have been dealing that accurately or completely with them on these assumptions.

It has been reported that Ukraine has asked for the deployment of a PATRIOT battery to defend its territory. Is there any good reason not to deploy it?

Do you believe the administration owes it to the people's representatives in Congress to keep it informed on these matters?

I totally agree that energy efficiency is a bi-partisan issue that we can work on together with you.

The American people run this Country. You don't run this Country. EPA does not run this Country.

It is 3,200 days. That is almost 10 years. We haven't had a Category 3 hurricane.

Those are huge economically impactful regulations that you are putting out that we don't get to vote on.

President Obama said in 2001 that 'I don't agree with a missile defense system.'

Considering the millions of dollars that the Congress has authorized for Iron Dome, the Congress should request data on the performance of Iron Dome from Israel.

Lower cost energy clearly creates jobs, it creates wealth.

You have not been given explicit statutory authority power to do what you are doing.

Good afternoon. I call this hearing of the Strategic Forces Subcommittee to order.

We have spent years trying to convince Russia that our missile defenses aren't about them.

Withdrawing from treaty is one strong possibility.

Did that theory work out any better for us that any of the Vice President's other foreign policy recommendations?

If the Administration knew about the INF violation since 2008, was it obligated to advise Congress of it at the earliest opportunity?

It's pretty clear that the Russian Federation vehemently dislikes U.S. missile defenses and plans for more missile defenses.

Why is Russia developing and deploying a new ground-launched cruise missile in violation of the INF Treaty?