Short answer? Likely no. Long answer? Hell no.
The White House has made a commitment, the president has said over and over and over, 'We're not gonna touch Social Secu...
You don't want able-bodied workers on a program that is intended, for example, for single mothers with two small childre...
The new reality is less government, more efficiency, better return for the taxpayers.
We're going to find those guys and we're going to send them back to work. That's what everybody supports, that's what th...
We're not gonna do that.
the most reasonable thing to do to ensure that the government is not shut down.
The White House has made a commitment. The president said over and over and over, ‘We’re not going to touch Social Secur...
They want us to limit the power of the executive branch... it's because of the Democrats.
And the new reality is less government, more efficiency, better return for the taxpayers.
It would be a clean CR mostly, I think, but with some of those changes to adapt to the new realities here.
We're gonna find those guys and we're gonna send them back to work.
The Democrats have been lying about it, and so it's important for us to clarify that.
Let’s let this play out.
Look, everybody needs to understand that the resolution is merely the starting point for the process.
We're gonna take care of those who are rightful beneficiaries of the program.
There’s no way that we’re going to agree to putting that kind of provision in there.
Short answer is likely no. Long answer is, hell no.
