All Quotes

The Office of the Actuary highlights many reasons why demographics help to explain some of the changes over time in benefits and benefit growth in DI and on the retirement side of Social Security.

My preference is for the first path of cooperation, bipartisanship, and responsibility.

One is what I have just traced out involving inquiry, research, and examination of what we can do to enhance the DI program and its finances and what we can agree upon. The other is to engage in divisive political rhetoric and demagogue…

It is premature to agree on some payroll tax reallocation as a patch of convenience and to kick the can down the road yet again.

Sadly, the Obama administration's approach to DI and Social Security in general has largely been to remain silent, even in the face of the impending DI trust fund exhaustion.

Most proposals to reform Social Security by raising payroll taxes would result in massive tax increases, particularly on middle-class Americans, negatively impacting job growth and harming middle-income families.

It is our responsibility to fully examine this system and work to improve it and its finances where we can.

No one wants that to happen, which is one reason why we are here today to begin responsibly looking at the DI program.

This is an important topic that deserves our immediate attention.

The level of trust and respect for law enforcement under the BLM seems marginal at best throughout my state.

In obtaining the consent of the United States, it is necessary to get the consent of the U.S. Congress.

The work of the OECD is done by consensus. That is, measures cannot be adopted without the consensus of all member countries.

It is a pleasure to work with you.

Such a discussion usually is not helpful, in my opinion, and typically ends up going nowhere.

It seems that a discussion of international tax reform can at times result in a debate of capital export neutrality versus capital import neutrality.

The effective corporate tax rate in the United States is 27.1 percent as compared to the rest of the OECD countries that have an unweighted average of 23.3 percent.

There is no evidence to support the assertion that U.S. multinational corporations are at a competitive disadvantage because they face larger corporate tax burdens than their competitors under a worldwide rather than territorial tax system.

Those bad outcomes would include international norms that increase tax disputes because they are vague.