A cut to NIH is not a cut to Washington bureaucracy; it is a cut to life-saving treatments and cures.
The $7.5 billion cut from NIH would, according to analysts, cost nearly 90,000 jobs nationwide.
The cut is one that I think you can rest assured this committee will not take.
there was no new money to do that, so it was truly a prioritization that eliminated programs and consolidated programs.
I was pleased to see the President's budget did include a renewal of the GSP program, and this is very important.
I think that is extremely important.
The budget, of course, proposes cuts that I think that you can rest assured the committee will find unacceptable.
In my home State of Missouri, that equates to a loss of nearly 1,700 jobs and $292 million in economic activity.
I fundamentally disagree with the proposed funding reduction for NIH.
It is incredibly important that NAFTA be updated and modernized.
This Committee and Congress did not agree, instead, appropriating a $2 billion increase for a second year in a row.
I certainly want to associate my comments and concerns with my colleagues who have raised the issue of agriculture and N...
Eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse in an effort to save taxpayer dollars and improve government services...
I think this is a problem that you can work out.
Yes, but we do not have the guy in charge.
I certainly would like to join with the Chairman in a bipartisan effort to contact the Administration
One of my top priorities as a Senator is focusing on how we can make government work better and more efficiently.
I would hope that we would all kind of join hands and try to force as much integration as possible.
