There are clear problems with the law if the Administration must violate the Constitution to keep the law afloat.
The Constitution clearly states that the power of the purse lies not with the Executive, but with the Congress.
If they think what they are doing is legal, then come before this committee and explain it.
If this CSR fund is struck down by the court then 6.4 million people will lose their subsidies.
The chancellor, in her speech, is not making a determination based on what the JCPOA says.
I am calling JCPOA--the agreement. You guys can use the letters. I am going to call it the agreement.
How does the agency intend to improve the final regulation to ensure that it achieves congressional mandates in the ESA ...
So if they are in violation then it may allow us to not have to proceed further with our obligations under the agreement...
One purpose of security procedures for classified information is to prevent hostile nations from obtaining classified in...
Would the BLM's proposed rule take away these special participation opportunities from states and local governments?
But Congress specifically omitted the word 'willfully' from this statute.
We either have responsibilities under this agreement or we don't.
These have been two very different countries, the United States and Iran, for a lot of years where there hasn't been any...
I think there's not really any other reason for the Federal Government to be involved in education other than that at th...
One of the things that is certainly true of the change in the law is that we have devolved the responsibility for implem...
I ask Members to support H.R. 5416, which would help the families of deceased veterans who received care through the Cho...
Our veterans answer our nation's call, and we shouldn't leave them waiting on the line.
It is not right that families are penalized if a veteran uses the Choice program.
