I wish we had more money. We are in a deep, systemic problem, and we are going to have to deal with entitlements.
It was passed much earlier than that, August 2011, when the bill was passed.
I think the title of this--what is it?--'Sequestering Justice,' is a bit over the top from my perspective.
We need a balanced approach in reduction of spending and tightening of our belt.
I do not think you should have to lay off that many.
I think that you have every right to come to Congress and express concerns if you think the level of support is so low.
The indiscriminate cuts of the sequester are truly penny wise and pound foolish.
I truly believe with the Chairman that the strength of the American experience is our rule of law.
I do not know where the cases are nationwide. In recent weeks we looked at gun prosecutions. They have been dropping.
I am hearing from some of my friends in Alabama that they think cuts of public defenders and all are more than they shou...
It is not a balanced approach if you are not going to raise any new revenues.
justice delayed is indeed justice denied.
It is not fair when Apple is taking all of its intellectual property and pretending it exists in Ireland.
Why did they wait--like they did the Defense Department.
I do believe that the Chief Justice and most of our judiciary do believe in efficiencies and are working in that regard.
Justice too long delayed is justice denied.
We do not have the money to run the Government. And we are not going to just keep raising taxes every time.
there has been progress over the last decade or so to update our system.
