There are always issues relating to making sure that we are in concert with the concerns of the community.

Can I expect that, if confirmed, you will continue to give ample consideration to our strategic position--and that, of course, includes Alaska--and to the importance of the rebalance?

We want to make sure--and this is something that I know that Senator Sullivan shares with me--that the rebalance to the Asia-Pacific remains a very strong commitment on our part.

It seems all of the panelists emphasize--or at least most of the panelists emphasize that the voluntary nature of the Framework was key to its initial success.

I also know that you share my view that the rebalance to the Asia-Pacific is more than just rhetoric.

If confirmed what measures will you consider for increasing retention of women in the military and achieving the diversity needed to mentor future female leaders?

Our strong Marine presence in the region plays a significant role in promoting the regional security and stability.

I would ask you to have a sense of urgency as you respond to this committee on how you are going to address and resolve the issue of retaliation.

We have to have ranges that support our ability to use our weapons and to maneuver the force.

The Army continues to assure its partners and allies through forward presence, rotational forces, military partnership engagements and exercises.

I am very concerned with ensuring that our Rebalance to Asia-Pacific is more than just rhetoric.

If confirmed, will you work to ensure that all of our computing centers are monitored and resourced under the modernization program to ensure that they all have the capability to provide required outputs?

I believe energy security is a vital component to our overall national security.

If confirmed, I will aggressively support the Air Force's current energy efficiency strategy which includes pursuing alternative and renewable energy sources.

What I am still concerned by is: what financial cost can be anticipated for both the dependent and the military when these services are moved to commercial health plans for treatment outside of MTFs?

Commissioners, when considering a transition to a new choice of commercial health plans, did the commission take into account the complexity and potential disruption dependents may face each time a Permanent Change of Station (PCS) occurs?

What plan will be in place to ensure that individuals who can ill afford a disruption in care will not be materially harmed by having to wait to enroll in a new health plan until after they PCS?

Did the commission evaluate the feasibility for implementing the robust frequency of financial literacy training you've recommended within the current training schedule of military units?