We're going to be working, I know, to do what's right to maintain our nuclear posture, but also keep control of costs.

I think you and I violently agree.

It was in many conservative and rural parts of America that benefited from Government investment with rural electrification.

I explained to him that, you know, these last flights home, it has been great to see the TSA debating whether we can make phone calls at 30,000 feet.

I think last I'll just say, you know, one of the places that we could see a substantial amount of solar development would be in Southern New Mexico.

I think I can be qualified as a health care expert for three reasons. I am a patient.

The Affordable Care Act at least tries to level that in many ways, but I am one of those policy makers that think we need to go do a lot more.

Great. Thank you for that commitment.

We have to transition to a clean energy economy. This is a commitment we owe future generations.

The debate over the RFS is not a debate between the oil industry and environmentalists. It's a debate between those who recognize the RFS is fundamentally broken and those who don't.

EPA missed the deadline for 2013 by over 9 months, the agency is only now proposing requirements for 2014, again missing the deadline.

Well, if you do it on time that would be nice, yes.

I am concerned that the proposed changes to the RFS could jeopardize near and long term growth in advanced biofuels.

The RFS may have seemed like a good idea in 2005 or 2007. But it is nothing short of a colossal failure.

Thank you for holding this hearing on renewable fuels.

The RFS threatens to cause widespread damage to engines, fuel systems, and our transportation fuel infrastructure.

The threat of global warming is real. That is not conjecture. That is science.

EPA cannot fix the RFS. Congress must weigh in--and repeal this broken program once and for all.