Individual Russian entities continue to provide assistance to Iran's ballistic missile programs.
On the public record
All Quotes
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
5,904·quotes on file
It seems to me at least that these directed energy type weapons have great potential to transform our future deterrence capability.
I appreciate the doubts that have been expressed by some about the concept of operations in an actual conflict.
As part of the PAA to European missile defense, my understanding is the administration is now seeking to establish a ground-based SM-3 missile defense site in Romania by 2015.
I appreciate that. I think sometimes too, though, that it gives them an out, a convenient out, an excuse at some point in the future.
I'm concerned that the administration may not fully implement its Phased Adaptive plans for missile defense in Europe.
This administration has attempted to make as clear as possible in the Missile Defense Review that it will do everything necessary to defend the U.S. Homeland.
Long-range strike capabilities contribute to the Air-Sea battle concept by helping to eliminate or limit the effectiveness of adversary anti-access.
How do you believe these reductions would be apportioned between the B-52 and B-2, and at what level of reduction do you become nervous about the viability of the bomber leg of the triad?
What are your views of this successful test of the Airborne Laser program, and do you think it marks the beginning of a revolution in military affairs?
I am very interested in any concept that helps preserve and extend freedom of action in the PACOM AOR.
The new QDR directs the Navy and the Air Force to develop a new joint Air-Sea Battle concept for defeating adversaries.
What's your view on this strategy by Iran, and how it would affect our ability to project power in the Middle East; specifically, in the Gulf of Iran and the Strait of Hormuz?
I'm interested in what your views are with regard to the activities by the Iranians to pursue some of these anti-access and area-denial strategies.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. General, Admiral, General, thank you very much for being here and thank you for your outstanding service to our country.
General Cartwright indicated--and this is quick--that we run the risk of making the triad a diad if we go below 800 delivery vehicles in the follow-on START.
We keep making more and more demands and resources get more and more constrained all the time.
I have long expressed the fear that it would be proposed by the administration in effect as a way to negotiate the bomber leg of the nuclear triad away.