What is the damage down to our alliances when we make such silly-looking deployments?
The administration is refusing to brief this committee, including its chairman, on the facts of its proposals to Russia ...
We have spent years trying to convince Russia that our missile defenses aren't about them.
We deploy missile defenses to deal with Chinese anti-ship ballistic missile capabilities, don't we?
In 2009, the administration sent Poland a PATRIOT battery, with no missile interceptors. The Poles called this deploymen...
I don't think you have been dealing that accurately or completely with them on these assumptions.
I totally agree that energy efficiency is a bi-partisan issue that we can work on together with you.
The American economy is important; I know you know that. We have a decline in median family wages in America since 2007 ...
The INF treaty is the only treaty the U.S. has ratified that has eliminated whole types and classes of nuclear weapons.
Should we approve those new aircraft and sensors if Russia isn't in compliance?
If you believe in arms control, shouldn't you be the most committed to seeing this treaty enforced? To punishing cheatin...
Russia got the U.S. to agree to unilateral reductions, while Russia is actually building up its nuclear forces under New...
Should the U.S. be concerned about new Russian missiles, like the RS-26 Rubezh, which Russia has tested at intermediate-...
Why is Russia developing and deploying a new ground-launched cruise missile in violation of the INF Treaty?
It's pretty clear that the Russian Federation vehemently dislikes U.S. missile defenses and plans for more missile defen...
If the Administration has decided to call the INF violation a 'violation' does the Administration owe it to the Congress...
Is the INF treaty still relevant for today's security environment?
If the Administration knew about the INF violation since 2008, was it obligated to advise Congress of it at the earliest...
