We don't see a path forward on this at the moment other than to have to literally look at shuttering our Colstrip Units ...
Your budget proposal includes $235 million for the EPA efforts to cut carbon pollution and greenhouse gases included in ...
We've got to also I think have the right balance here, and I think strategically by working with us to develop clean coa...
to take American innovation out of the equation to let America lead in clean coal technology versus ceding it to the Chi...
the change in climate temperature for the world would be .02 degrees Centigrade between now and the year 2100 as a resul...
When I am told something is going to be on track, I expect it to be so.
Why are we doing this?
I just hope that we learn from this going forward, because I just don't think this is really--the optics are horrible.
We have to weigh tradeoffs in terms of a cost-benefit analysis.
How effective is the proposed rule in impacting global emissions in a meaningful way?
If I am sitting here thinking about investment, what is the net benefit in dollars to the American taxpayer based on you...
But what that does is it creates a lot of uncertainty in understanding...
So net-net, in terms of we sit up here on this dais as U.S. Senators, ensuring we are responsible stewards of the Americ...
The benefit, arguably, is perhaps de minimis.
It sounds like D.C. math to me.
If there's no intention, why not keep it fixed?
It seems like commonsense to me that if there is a program that works, we should make more investments in those kinds of...
Supporting tribal infrastructure and needs is crucial to upholding the U.S. Government's trust responsibility to Indian ...
