On the public record
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
11,700+·quotes on file
Medicare for all would also authorize a government takeover of health care treatments by allowing the federal government to steal a company's intellectual property if the company and the federal government cannot come to an agreement on…
Under Medicare for all, what company would spend tens of millions of dollars developing the latest medical breakthrough, only to see the federal government take it away?
The result of this total government takeover of Americans' health care would place Washington bureaucrats, and not doctors and patients, completely in charge of the health care decisions of Americans.
Medicare for all would accelerate our movement down this path.
The only thing that Medicare for all would get us... is the health care decisions of Americans, centralizing them with Washington bureaucrats.
Medicare for all would establish a government-run, single-payer health care system that would completely upend the health care system as Americans know it today.
there is obviously great support in Congress for an exclusion process for List 3, and we have chatted about it, and I appreciate that.
When can we expect that Federal Register notice?
And with that, when do you anticipate releasing more decisions for exclusion requests from Lists 1 or 2 of the 301 tariffs?
Do you expect to meet that 30-day deadline?
I ask permission to insert into the record a letter signed by over 150 trade associations, asking for a Federal Register notice that formally delays the increase of the List 3 tariffs from 10 percent to 25 percent.
I want to thank former Chairman Bishop and Chairman Grijalva for their work on this legislation. This is a proud moment. We listened to a lot of angst a while ago, and now we look at two people working together to solve a problem. This is…
Yes, I believe New START meets this threshold with one exception.
There is really a desire for something to be out there.
Several members of Congress have already proposed legislation along these lines.
It seems to me to be really a safety net there.
There is precedent for using patient diplomacy to resolve treaty violations.