Medicare for all would also authorize a government takeover of health care treatments by allowing the federal government to steal a company's intellectual property if the company and the federal government cannot come to an agreement on…
On the public record
All Quotes
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
12,000+·quotes on file
The result of this total government takeover of Americans' health care would place Washington bureaucrats, and not doctors and patients, completely in charge of the health care decisions of Americans.
Medicare for all would establish a government-run, single-payer health care system that would completely upend the health care system as Americans know it today.
The only thing that Medicare for all would get us... is the health care decisions of Americans, centralizing them with Washington bureaucrats.
Do you expect to meet that 30-day deadline?
When can we expect that Federal Register notice?
There is obviously great support in Congress for an exclusion process for List 3, and we have chatted about it, and I appreciate that.
And with that, when do you anticipate releasing more decisions for exclusion requests from Lists 1 or 2 of the 301 tariffs?
I ask permission to insert into the record a letter signed by over 150 trade associations, asking for a Federal Register notice that formally delays the increase of the List 3 tariffs from 10 percent to 25 percent.
Several members of Congress have already proposed legislation along these lines.
It seems to me to be really a safety net there.
I want to make sure that whatever we do here in this committee it includes audio data and also considers location data based on hardware within a device.
There is precedent for using patient diplomacy to resolve treaty violations.
Yes, I believe New START meets this threshold with one exception.
In the likely event the INF Treaty collapses in August, the only remaining bilateral U.S.-Russia arms control agreement would be New START, which expires in 2021 but can be extended by up to five years through agreement by both parties.
The reasons for Russia's violation are unclear. But I believe the violation was likely due to a number of factors...
Congress could condition funding to develop new missiles on receipt from the administration of a comprehensive military, economic, and diplomatic strategy to bring Russia back into compliance with the treaty.
Congress has the ability to press the administration on its strategy to prevent a new Euro-missile race and increased instability in the absence of the INF Treaty.