The level of oversight here is all three branches of government, and it's significant to try to secure those privacies.
702 is designed to go after foreign bad guys. It's lawful collection.
Finding that balance so that we don't take away private rights and at the same time use the necessary tools to determine what the bad guys a...
We want to do everything we can to make sure those private rights are secure.
I couldn't agree with you more. A lot of my colleagues have heard me talk when I was a member of the committee about finding that balance.
There is oversight and review within the Executive Branch, and heaven knows there's a lot of oversight here in the Congress over this.
I want to make sure that we do everything possible, first, to educate everyone so that they understand what is authorized and what is not au...
We have sent them information as to how to modify it. It has not been addressed yet, but I have been reassured over and over and over by the...
I would and the intelligence community also sees it that way, the entire community.
I want to do that. I think more transparency needs to be offered to the public relative to what this is and what this isn't.
That is correct.
I think maybe sooner rather than later, that would be something we ought to look at.
I think it's worth going back and looking at the original intent and then the reports from Robb-Silberman.
As I've indicated before, I'm going to take that message to the Administration that the question was raised here.
we need to act sooner rather than later.
I'm fully prepared to assume the responsibilities.
We cannot afford to be behind the curve in terms of development of both the offensive and defensive capacities that we put up into space.
I absolutely support that. That is the law.
