I think the Senate is almost unanimous in agreeing that a return to sequestration would be most harmful.
Given the critical importance of maritime surveillance to our national security and our economy, we cannot afford a gap ...
Thank you.
Where can we see one of those?
just because we made it through in 2013, 2014, and 2015 doesn't mean that the next year will be a piece of cake
I am also deeply concerned about the extraordinary cost of the Ohio-class submarine Replacement Program.
Mr. Dee, I mentioned concerns about substituting wheeled armored personnel carriers for amphibious track vehicles.
Well, we want to work with you on that, and be part of the solution.
maximizing sortie generation rate was the purpose behind these new technologies.
sequestration was designed to be stupid. It was explicitly designed to be so unacceptable that Congress would find a sol...
I don't think we should be surprised, because this is a significant capital investment that comes along every 30 to 40 y...
EMALS is supposed to be able to give us a better rate of launching.
Are we being a little more realistic about the expected timeframe in which we are going to have to use these aircraft?
Before we begin, I think Senator Hirono and I would both like to express our concern for the seven marines and four sold...
Great.
I am encouraged by continued investment in technologies that support our military strategy in the Asia-Pacific region.
I would just hope that we as decision-makers and particularly the commander in chief as a decision-maker would make sure...
Unless the law changes, sequestration is back in October of this year.
