the decision to agree to a limit of 700 deployed strategic delivery vehicles did not result from a change in the securit...
the prohibition on the conversion of missile defense interceptors to offensive launchers set forth in Article V will hav...
The press has reported that the administration is going to spend about $100 billion over the next 10 years in nuclear de...
why do you believe $100 billion is a sufficient investment in our delivery systems over the next decade?
DOD expects the current nuclear bomber force to remain in service through 2040.
I think this is an important discussion to have not only with respect to the merger in front of us...
I have witnessed first-hand the changes that have occurred as a result of the Northwest/Delta merger...
There are many of us who are very concerned about the future of the industry, the impacts of this merger...
if the same number of people want to travel, but there are less options available, all else equal, prices would rise.
General Cartwright, as well as the rest of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secretary of Defense, and both of us support t...
the New START is supposed to be about strategic offensive nuclear arms.
The United States will continue to configure and posture its forces to maintain the overall force's combined qualities o...
the New START treaty does not constrain the United States from deploying the most effective missile defenses possible.
Thank you very much for providing your insights and responding to some of the questions that many of us have on this ver...
I believe that the Russian strategic force under New START will be ICBM-heavy, with many of those ICBMs MIRVed.
Mr. Miller and Dr. Payne, with the New START's limitations going into effect within 7 years, at what point do we need to...
I believe it is critically important that the United States maintain a modern and effective ICBM force.
Thirty more years is a long time for a bomber that was built 50 years ago.
