I would think that a 25 percent cut to the State Department would make it a lot harder for you to work with your partners.

We have also seen the lengths Russia has gone to disrupt our democracy in United States elections.

The most toxic thing to readiness has been continuing resolutions and the Budget Control Act.

Should the Navy and PACOM take a fresh look at the basing of P-8s, given our primary threats will be in the Indo-Pacific?

It's important for the United States to project strength, reassure our allies, and build partnerships in Asia-Pacific.

Eagle Vision provides a cost-effective capability with a high return on investment.

NATO has undertaken a reorganization to proactively combat Russian aggression.

Admiral Harris, in your opinion, what recommendations would you offer to counter the naval threat China and Russia pose in the region?

A reduction of their abilities would not be positive.

Russia is developing an intercontinental-range hypersonic glide vehicle intended to defeat ballistic missile defenses.

Well, as a strong supporter of the Jones Act, that is kind of where we should be, I would say.

threats in the cyber domain pose a serious threat to our decisive logistics advantage.

The consequences could be significant for the United States.

China's historically unprecedented economic development has enabled an impressive military buildup that could soon challenge the United States across almost all domains.

Russia and China pose an enduring threat to United States and Allied interests.

I am concerned that the inability to renegotiate an MOU may result in the loss of a unique space surveillance capability.

The tightening of the labor market and the increased recruiting missions will be a challenge in the coming year.

We are strongest when we fight together with our allies and partners in this integrated battlefield.