
But the point is that the post office has had major, major problems for years and that we've been trying to sort through this in the most effective way that we can to resolve the problems for the post office.
On the public record
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
12,700+·quotes on file

But the point is that the post office has had major, major problems for years and that we've been trying to sort through this in the most effective way that we can to resolve the problems for the post office.

This is all about politics; it's really not about the post office.

the reason that we don't allow noncitizens to participate in our elections is because it could have a deleterious impact on our ability to govern ourselves as a representative republic.

I would be thrilled if, in fact, we had the jurisdictional reach that you described earlier, but I respectfully disagree that we have any jurisdiction whatsoever over the topic of today's hearing.

Mr. DeJoy, these will be yes and no for the most part. Is there any way the post offices can know whether or not ballots that they are delivering to households or to eligible voters--is there any way for the Post Office to know that?

So, my question to you, Mr. DeJoy, is there any way to be sure that more ballots than a household should be eligible to receive are not being delivered?

Well, we need to make sure that this election is not tainted by fraudulent mail-in ballots.

We are here today because my Democratic colleagues have created a conspiratorial crisis out of thin air in another attempt to dupe Americans with an election hoax. Only this time, instead of Russia, it is the United States Postal Service…

I think that both Joe and Kamala equally are wonderful examples of the American dream.

I think that we have seen this president time and time again be misogynistic and racist.

I truly believe that this ticket complements and adds to the American fabric.

Well, that's interesting, because a subsequent publication or another publication from The Lancet said that cold weather, even moderate cold, kills 20 times more people than heat.

I agree that the climate is changing, and I believe human activity contributes to it, but that is not the leading factor for climate change.

Do you agree that we're better off reducing economic activity to protect human health, in regard to reducing pollution?

If we completely eliminated all CO2 emissions, went to absolute zero in the United States, would it stop climate change? And their unanimous answer was no.

But I think that Dr. Shellenberger is right on point in that the way to do that is to utilize the technology that we have.

I think there are still issues with that, with that information, the personal identification information that's still out there.

I just want to ask you if you think that this poses a significant economic and national security risk.