I think this is right in line with what we are trying to do with the budget reform and appropriations task force to fix this.
I do not blame the CBO for all of its failures. But I do think we have got to eliminate the gimmicks.
But if it is an open-ended deal where it depends on how many people signup, I do not think that is a cut.
There has got to be better information, in my opinion, that comes out that takes into account these improvements in the economy.
we have seen estimates as high as $1.9 trillion in terms of what overregulation is costing the economy.
I think we owe it to the taxpayers to be an A-plus.
Why does the NPR recommend retaining the B83 nuclear gravity bomb?
What does the NPR recommend regarding our nuclear command, control, and communications (NC3) system?
We are losing around 60,000 Americans a year on prescription pill and heroin overdoses.
Officials in the Department, and several combatant commanders, have expressed the need to develop next generation technologies in directed e...
Isn't it correct that the low-yield SLBM warhead is a simple modification to an existing weapon? Not a new weapon?
Wouldn't this be updating and redeploying a capability we used to have?
Yes, the commitment to nuclear deterrence is not only affordable it is essential to our National Security--America can afford survival.
I agree with that statement wholeheartedly; however, that is not what is reflected in the PB19 budget submission.
Maintaining an effective nuclear deterrent is much less expensive than fighting a war that we fail to deter.
The NDS highlights a need to continue international collaboration for missile defense.
What is your assessment of the impacts from Russia's violation of the INF Treaty?
Should we be considering extending the New START Treaty while Russia is violating the INF Treaty?
